1756-EN2TR vs 1756-EN2TP What's the major differences

Calscada

Lifetime Supporting Member
Join Date
Mar 2022
Location
California
Posts
10
1756-um004_-en-p

From the manual above, 1756-EN2TP supports PPP communication, and the 1756-EN2TR has an embedded switch.

Is the EN2TR embedded switch needed for DLR redundancy? In what case would you choose one over the other, and what are their significant feature differences?

Thanks for the help!
 
PRP versus DLR

I think you understand the basics.

There are two different ways to get media fault tolerance in a ControlLogix EtherNet/IP network, and each of those modules supports one of them.

The modules with an "R" at the end of the part number support Device-Level Ring (DLR).

DLR devices use a special "2-port switch" connected in a daisy-chain ring that self-heals a single link failure very fast. DLR was developed jointly by RA and Cisco, cooperating and documenting through ODVA (Open Device Vendor Association) committes. DLR is well supported both in ControlLogix and CompactLogix as well in smaller devices like VFDs, servos, and I/O adapters.

The modules with a "P" at the end of the part number support Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP).

PRP is more like a "redundancy" system: there are dual links between dual switches that send frames at the same time and use the one that arrives first. It's an IEC standard, rather than something specific to industrial controls.

Adoption and use of PRP is less common in ControlLogix based control systems; 1756 and FLEX 5000 are the main devices that support it. No CompactLogix controllers support it.

"Why would I use one instead of the other ?" is a question I'm not sure I can answer personally because I've never built a PRP system. In general I don't think you'd use it unless you need very high availability networking with a ControlLogix Redundancy system, and have the hardware, training, and maintenance budget to make it worthwhile.
 
thanks buddy for the response! And I just found the PRP documentation. It threw me off seeing the P module as I've only ever dealt with R and DLR. Then looking at the R module, it has the embedded switch where P does not and that confused me.
 

Similar Topics

I am using Allen Bradley PLC 1756-L81E and EIP module 1756-EN2TR for Ethernet/IP communication. My communication works fine but in Get-Attribute...
Replies
2
Views
203
Hi All, Got a funny issue. I have a 1756-L85EP and a 1756-EN2TR in the same chase. The client asked for the Ferrari and the 3 lane highway!!! We...
Replies
1
Views
168
Good morning, I have a system on 1756 L73 that works with supervisor on EN2TR modules. Everything works correctly, except that EN2TR (1) with...
Replies
4
Views
502
Hi. Rockwell learning curve 132-1b. I was having trouble to change IP address on a EN2TR. Finally found out that I need to change the IP...
Replies
1
Views
749
Hello Everyone, What is the best practice for DLR set up. Should I keep all VFDs on one DLR and FlexIO on another or it would make sense to put...
Replies
8
Views
2,607
Back
Top Bottom