williamlove
Member
I am designing a replacement for a SLC system. The existing SLC has two 12 slot chassis next to each other in the main panel connected by an extension cable that makes them act as one local chassis. The SLC system also has one 12 slot RIO chassis out in the field. A scanner card in the main chassis connects to that remote chassis.
Q1. The ControlLogix system will have two 16 slot chassis in the main panel (lots of spare slots). A 1756-EN2T will be installed in each of those two chassis to connect them. Is that a simple, sensible design? (Let's leave rings out of this for now, to keep it simple.)
Q2. The ControlLogix main chassis will have a second 1756-EN2T to connect to the HMI and workstation. Anything wrong there?
Q3. The remotely located SLC chassis will be replaced by a RIO panel containing Flex I/O. Do I need a second 1756-EN2T in the main chassis for this? Put another way, do you need multiple EN2T cards in the main chassis for multiple RIO panels, or is just one in the main panel enough to daisy chain(?) to multiple RIO panels?
Q1. The ControlLogix system will have two 16 slot chassis in the main panel (lots of spare slots). A 1756-EN2T will be installed in each of those two chassis to connect them. Is that a simple, sensible design? (Let's leave rings out of this for now, to keep it simple.)
Q2. The ControlLogix main chassis will have a second 1756-EN2T to connect to the HMI and workstation. Anything wrong there?
Q3. The remotely located SLC chassis will be replaced by a RIO panel containing Flex I/O. Do I need a second 1756-EN2T in the main chassis for this? Put another way, do you need multiple EN2T cards in the main chassis for multiple RIO panels, or is just one in the main panel enough to daisy chain(?) to multiple RIO panels?