rgurin
Member
I saw something similar to this earlier from the Washington Post. One thing mentioned in the Post that I did not see there is that some Bush critics have acknowledged that even if the levee funding had not been cut, it still may not have completely averted the flooding, since the levees would have been reinforced only to survive up to a Category 3 hurricane.
Also, I don't think the needed repairs could have been finished in time.
(Sidenote: I would consider myself aligned in thought more with the critics, but as a former journalist, I believe in presenting both sides of the story--even if I personally believe one side is BS!)
Also, I don't think the needed repairs could have been finished in time.
(Sidenote: I would consider myself aligned in thought more with the critics, but as a former journalist, I believe in presenting both sides of the story--even if I personally believe one side is BS!)