James Mcquade
Member
OP
drbitboy,
thanks for the clarification, i've been busy all day.
thanks everyone,
james
thanks for the clarification, i've been busy all day.
thanks everyone,
james
i am trying to use the < S(312) command, but i am having trouble getting it to work.
In regards to the < S(312) command, would someone please post the command?
they overfilled the tank, water went everywhere.
It's the wrong solution but if you are still having troubles with signed vs. unsigned (which I don't think you are, but just in case), have you considered keeping unsigned and simply adding a level > 32767 instruction ORed (on a branch in parallel) with the level < &2100 and level < &2880 instructions?i will try in a few weeks when they have to empty it for cleaning.
It's the wrong solution but if you are still having troubles with signed vs. unsigned (which I don't think you are, but just in case), have you considered keeping unsigned and simply adding a level > 32767 instruction ORed (on a branch in parallel) with the level < &2100 and level < &2880 instructions?
The rationale is that, if the unsigned level value in the <S(310) comparison instruction is greater than 32767, then the input channel is actually returning a negative signed value for the level, which must be less than the positive comparison values (&2100 and &2880).