Cudos to you LD for doing this.
I took a look at the STL code but was a bit stumped when I saw this:
Why
A L 10.2
NOT
instead of
AN L 10.2
?
And why not store the intermediary result in L26.2 immediately instead of waiting to just before the compare ?
I can see that it works the same, but it made it harder to read and I thought maybe there was something I was missing.
STL generated from SCL sure isnt meant to be reverse engineered.
I took a look at the STL code but was a bit stumped when I saw this:
Code:
CLR
A L 10.2
NOT
A L 12.2
L #RFID
L DW#16#0
= L 26.2
==D
A L 26.2
JCN A7d2
Why
A L 10.2
NOT
instead of
AN L 10.2
?
And why not store the intermediary result in L26.2 immediately instead of waiting to just before the compare ?
I can see that it works the same, but it made it harder to read and I thought maybe there was something I was missing.
STL generated from SCL sure isnt meant to be reverse engineered.