SMC JXC91 drive and 1769-L35E (v15.3)

ADiaz

Member
Join Date
Jan 2021
Location
Murcia
Posts
3
Good morning guys.

Im triying to communicate 4 JXC91 with a 1769-L35E AB CPU.

I already test the JXC91 with a newer AB CPU using eds files and works great.

I was researching about the connection with this older CPU so I create the JXC91 as a generic ethernet module in my program and define data type and and assembly instances as SMC indicate. (See pictures attached).

At my first try I put a wrong assembly instance and received a code error indicating invalid segment. (Wrong assembly instance number). After the correction I only received error code 16#0203, PLC try to stablish comms but without achive it.

Do you know if could be an incompatible problem because the PLC is too old? Should I use MSG instruction?

Captura.PNG Captura2.PNG
 
Those settings do look correct.

Can you PING or view the SMC device's webpage to verify that it is set for the correct IP address ?

Also try using the Windows PowerShell "test net connection" (tnc) to be sure that TCP Port 44818 is open on the SMC device.

In Studio 5000, delete the I/O connection entirely and create a new one with a new name to be sure nothing in the configuration is corrupted.

I cannot tell for sure from your screenshots, but I have seen instances where creating a Generic EtherNet/IP Module with incorrect parameters, then correcting them, led to an "abandoned" corrupted setting that you could not change (for electronic keying). Deleting, then re-creating, the connection fixed that problem.
 
Those settings do look correct.

Can you PING or view the SMC device's webpage to verify that it is set for the correct IP address ?

Also try using the Windows PowerShell "test net connection" (tnc) to be sure that TCP Port 44818 is open on the SMC device.

In Studio 5000, delete the I/O connection entirely and create a new one with a new name to be sure nothing in the configuration is corrupted.

I cannot tell for sure from your screenshots, but I have seen instances where creating a Generic EtherNet/IP Module with incorrect parameters, then correcting them, led to an "abandoned" corrupted setting that you could not change (for electronic keying). Deleting, then re-creating, the connection fixed that problem.

Thank you for your response.
I can ping SMC devices so IP is OK.
I will upgrade PLC firmware to rev20 next week on site. And test again using SMC EDS file (not Generic EtherNet/IP Module).

I will check also the TCP port that you commnet.

(Im using RSLogix 5000 not studio. Because of the PLC model).
 

Similar Topics

Hi All Thanks in advance for the help. I am using an SMC JXC91 drive, i see alot of information for a compactlogix PLC. Is there any info for a...
Replies
9
Views
2,389
Hi, I want to start 150 SMC Flex from Studio 5000. I have the AOP and P SMC flex AOI imported in my program. I have also set the logic mask to...
Replies
0
Views
312
Hi everyone, We are having Fanuc 16 i CNC system. I need to interface SMC ex260 SEN-1 ethernet valve module with the CNC . Does anyone know the...
Replies
0
Views
358
I am trying to add a TCPIP server group to integrate a Schneider M221 PLC in to Wonderware. When right clicking on the Operations Integration...
Replies
0
Views
425
Hello there, Our plant is running Wonderware Historian on a Virtual Server and every few days I'm losing comms to my PLCs. Usually I can simply...
Replies
3
Views
2,073
Back
Top Bottom