Baker in Virginia
Member
Good Morning ,
I am going to be re-working 2 portable machines. I am going to have one main panel with a CompactLogix and 3 PowerFlex 527's. I am going to have a plug to supply voltage , and the motor wires from the drives. I am going to have Flex I/O in the portable machines. I would like to attach Incremental Encoders to the motors . From these encoders I was thinking of terminating to a 1794-ID2 module. The reason I would like to attach encoders to these motors is to maintain the RPM . I know the best solution would be to terminate the encoder wires directly to the PowerFlex 527. If I use the 1794-ID2 , will it be fast enough to sense any change in RPM , so I can adjust my freqency command to the drive ? It sounds like it is unorthodox to take the encoder into the PLC instead of the Drive , correct ? I am just keeping from needing to use another plug , and deal with broken wires , etc.
Thanks so much in advance,
I am going to be re-working 2 portable machines. I am going to have one main panel with a CompactLogix and 3 PowerFlex 527's. I am going to have a plug to supply voltage , and the motor wires from the drives. I am going to have Flex I/O in the portable machines. I would like to attach Incremental Encoders to the motors . From these encoders I was thinking of terminating to a 1794-ID2 module. The reason I would like to attach encoders to these motors is to maintain the RPM . I know the best solution would be to terminate the encoder wires directly to the PowerFlex 527. If I use the 1794-ID2 , will it be fast enough to sense any change in RPM , so I can adjust my freqency command to the drive ? It sounds like it is unorthodox to take the encoder into the PLC instead of the Drive , correct ? I am just keeping from needing to use another plug , and deal with broken wires , etc.
Thanks so much in advance,