forcing bits on and off Logix 5000

You need to find the tag Local:3:I.Data.11 assuming its your 11th input on your card just guessing it is from where your cursor was in the screen shot, then it should allow you to force it

WOW....why would they make this so confusing. seems like RSL500 is click heaven compared to this. thanks a million guys. even though i can run now with the force installed my line is still stopping, this time with no fault because my fault bit never goes true due to the force. can this stopping possibly be because of that second problem i was unaware of at first, the 1756 DHRIO, maybe?

finding force local bit location.jpg
 
In the SLC500 the inputs have fixed system names (I:1/5 for example). But if, at the start of the program the whole group of inputs were copied to, let's say, a B register's word, you would have the same problem in trying to 'force' one of the 'B' bits. You would have to go back to the actual 'I' input bit to force it.

The problem lies in the understanding of the structure. Once you understand that 'Local ... etc' is the pre-assigned system name for the input and it was being copied to another memory register you would realise that you couldn't force that second register, you can only force the pre-assigned name.

But (to add to the confusion) the Controllogix family adds the idea of an 'alias' which is a whole seperate tag but can be DIRECTLY tied to the input bit. It is SO directly tied that you can 'force' the alias and it is exactly the same as forcing the 'Local' bit. This does not have a similar idea in the SLC500/Micrologix world. But we weren't dealing with the 'alias' in this case.
 
In this case the "they" you speak of is not the designers of RSLogix5000 but whoever converted a SLC PLC program to CLX and decided to follow legacy conventions. Its one of many reasons why I prefer to rewrite the programs to take advantage of the features of the ControlLogix platform.
 
showshocka said:
can this stopping possibly be because of that second problem i was unaware of at first, the 1756 DHRIO, maybe?

Highly unlikely. see rdrast post above.

More likely in no particular order:
1) You mis understood what is triggering the fault, and have forced one of two or more input devices (haven't looked at your alarm code) that must be forced.
2) You caused another fault that doesn't like the fact that the photo cell now never changes states.
3) The photocell is hardwired to more than just the PLC input and stops the line electrically via external control wiring or other logic.
 
1) You mis understood what is triggering the fault, and have forced one of two or more input devices (haven't looked at your alarm code) that must be forced.
2) You caused another fault that doesn't like the fact that the photo cell now never changes states.
i found that fault on the DHRIO card before i even learned how to do forces:D....but if i don't need to worry about that fault i won't...with my force installed the line is running find for now. ThankS for all your help.
 
Last edited:
The problem lies in the understanding of the structure. Once you understand that 'Local ... etc' is the pre-assigned system name for the input
now that we're on the subject of "local", i looked through my training course notes and found exactly what you're talking about...thanks
 

Similar Topics

Dear Fellows; I am working on a very old machine which is designed in GE 90-30 PLC system. I have some difficulties like 1. How a force to...
Replies
3
Views
352
Control logix5000. If have an XIC on a rung with an OTE I can force the OTE on but if I force the XIC it doesn't turn on the OTE. Why is that...
Replies
26
Views
6,770
Hi, I haven't used Unity for a while and have just fired it up to develop a good sized program. At first glance it seems that I can only force...
Replies
5
Views
9,340
Hi. This is the first time I do a project with Rockwell PLC from scratch. I started a bit just building some AOI for a couple things I need to...
Replies
2
Views
576
Hello, when trying to force two outputs nothing happened. The text ON appeared by the adress. It was also possible to force off, which also...
Replies
17
Views
4,809
Back
Top Bottom