New slc 500 user

Carlos V

Member
Join Date
Jun 2007
Location
George Town
Posts
17
Can somebody tell me if the rung comments and instruction comments are stored in the slc 500 controller or are they stored on you hard drive
 
They are stored with the RSLogix500 file, not int the processor. Same is true with all A-B processors. Although you can upload the file from the processor, it really is a pain to figure out without the original, commented and documented file.
 
finski2 said:
Same is true with all A-B processors.

This is only true of the older legacy PLC2/3/5 and SLC 100/500 product lines and with the Micrologix because it is based on the SLC500 model.
 
Last edited:
ControlLogix processors store tag names in RLL, UDT names, and store all comments and text in ST, FB, and SFC in the the processor.
 
So the RSLogix5000 Help File is lying when it says:
"If you do not have the matching project file for a controller, you can upload from the controller and create the project file. However, not everything that was stored in the original project file is available from the controller. If you upload from the controller, the new project file will not contain any of the following information:
§ Rung comments.
§ Descriptions for tags, tasks, programs, routines, tasks, modules, user-defined data types.
§ Chains of aliases (i.e., aliases pointing to other aliases).
Alias chains are not completely reconstructed. Instead, aliases refer to the tag name that most closely fits the memory addressed by the alias." ?
 
No, you are correct that the Logix processors will not store rung comments, instruction comments, etc.

David

P.S. with the CF card installed, you could, however, leave a copy of the project file there. So essentially, you could leave documentation on the processor.
 
finski2-

Alaric and the manual are not contradicting each other. You are focusing on RLL. Alaric is referring to the other three languages that Logix5K supports. He didn't specifically make a comment on RLL. He said UDTs are stored not UTD comments.

Granted, you aren't necessarily referring to the same programming forms but there is no contradiction because of this either.

Keith
 
finski2 made the implication that you cannot have any program documentation stored in all AB PLCs. This is simply not the case. It was only later that he narrowed the scope to rung comments.
 
Alaric-

The original question was regarding a SLC 500 ladder logic comment storage. I don't believe any implications were made on my part to include other programming languages.

If anything, your response was equally, if not more, misleading as though to imply rung comments and tag descriptions were stored in ControlLogix PLC's.

Check yourself, before you wreck yourself.

I'm out.
 

Similar Topics

I have a program that I've used 100 times. SQO settings: File N7:0, Mask 0FFFFh, Dest B3:1, Control R6:0, Length 8, Pos 2. Length & Position...
Replies
48
Views
958
Everyone, i am in the process of purchasing the Slc 500 version of software to support what we have and i have a question. Several of our...
Replies
9
Views
768
In a slc 500 plc I am trying to move data with out using a lot of moves. I want to move data from n7:1 to n7:2 and data that was in n7:2 to n7:3...
Replies
16
Views
1,356
Customer has a circa 2004 SLC-500 PLC. Fieldbus is a 1747-SDN DeviceNet scanner. Customer has SLC-500 file (.rss) with no comments. Has no *.dnt...
Replies
7
Views
558
After I tried wiring, I used computer program communication to read the PLC N value, but received a NAK signal. And the DL3500 CHA light keeps...
Replies
0
Views
424
Back
Top Bottom