Chuck Hoyt
Member
Gentlemen,
I am the "radio guy" that occasionally runs into PLC challenges as follows:
My customer/integrator has found that the radios he is installing for his customer are not compatible with DF1 in full duplex but will handle DF1 in half duplex. He is using SLC503s and is using the RS232 Com 0 port. He has turned on the half duplex option in the PLC but is not having any luck. This is a point-multipoint radio system (although at the moment he is only testing to one site) and assuming the RF path is good and the radio is set up properly and he has turned off handshaking (as the radios do not require it), what other settings in the PLC must he be aware of? (He would get on himself but he and his wife are about to go on vacation and he has been banned from the computer). I told him I'd try to get the ball rolling. He is able to see the poll (via the LEDs both on the radio and on the PLC) but the PLC does not respond. He has confirmed the address is correct, and we have not yet had the opportunity to put a protocol analyzer in line to see if the poll is being corrupted. Any insight would be appreciated!
Chuck
I am the "radio guy" that occasionally runs into PLC challenges as follows:
My customer/integrator has found that the radios he is installing for his customer are not compatible with DF1 in full duplex but will handle DF1 in half duplex. He is using SLC503s and is using the RS232 Com 0 port. He has turned on the half duplex option in the PLC but is not having any luck. This is a point-multipoint radio system (although at the moment he is only testing to one site) and assuming the RF path is good and the radio is set up properly and he has turned off handshaking (as the radios do not require it), what other settings in the PLC must he be aware of? (He would get on himself but he and his wife are about to go on vacation and he has been banned from the computer). I told him I'd try to get the ball rolling. He is able to see the poll (via the LEDs both on the radio and on the PLC) but the PLC does not respond. He has confirmed the address is correct, and we have not yet had the opportunity to put a protocol analyzer in line to see if the poll is being corrupted. Any insight would be appreciated!
Chuck