chiefjimbo
Member
We've been using Allen-Bradley's 1783-NATR and find it is easy enough to work with. Unfortunately, it only allows 5 ports to be opened per IP address/Device that is mapped from the private side. The limitation of 5 prevents us from connecting to some vision systems and robot platforms as some vendors require 10-15 ports to communicate.
Is the MOXA NAT-102 any better? It looks much more feature rich but it isn't clear if it has an upper bound on TCP/UDP ports you can open for each IP address.
Is the MOXA NAT-102 any better? It looks much more feature rich but it isn't clear if it has an upper bound on TCP/UDP ports you can open for each IP address.