I haven't been following this thread until just now, although when I read the original comment about "going metric" right back at the beginning, I thought the better of posting because anything I might say from outside the USA going to be hard not to sound self-righteous at the least. And before anyone wants to rip into me for being "anti-American" please bear in mind that I am one of the rabid "pro-AB guys" in this forum.
It is an interesting subject though. The question of the USA converting to metric was a live topic during the Reagan Administration, and as I recall the program was well advanced before the White House nixed it. Seemed a shame at the time, and with the passage of time, the lack of gumption to carry the conversion forward looks even sillier.
The metric system is NOT a British thing. It originated out of Europe, with the French leading the way; which is why its' official name is Systeme Internationale (SI). In fact the USA is now the ONLY significant economy in the world that does not use SI. As time goes by this will only continue to erode the position of the American economy in the world. Even if one cannot attribute a direct monetary cost to this, to a whole new generation of engineers and technical people who have grown up in a global economy, and who have only ever known metric, they look at American instrangience on this matter with bafflement and some disdain. As time goes by the US position just looks plain "out of date".
Here in New Zealand, one day in 1967 we did a "cold turkey" conversion of our official units AND currency to decimal in one hit. Prior to that we used the old British "Imperial" system and Pounds, Shillings and Pence; after it was SI and Dollars. Conversion happened smoothly enough and although many items tooks years to change (eg our topo maps had height contours in feet for decades after) the whole thing was pretty much a non-event in terms of cost and disruption. Is there any real reason why a larger country like the USA would encounter obstacles to conversion that it's correspondingly larger resources could not solve?