Rube said:
Is that similar to "Shotgunning", where you replace all the parts in order to make sure you got the bad one?
At a GE factory school a long time ago, we were told that it is more cost effective to replace a couple of small parts, then waste a couple of hours trying to determine which part is actually bad. This works out fairly well when doing component level repairs in an emergency or pressure situation.
Similar to replacing a PLC card on a down machine when half the plant is looking over your shoulder waiting, when there is a possibility that it may not be the problem.
At time time I am writing this, yam has not logged back in under his ID. Maybe he is gone for good, maybe he will reappear as a guest or under a new ID. If he doesn't return, it is his loss.
I looked over my buddy list a few days back, and saw quite a few names that I haven't seen on here in a long time. Many were regulars. Checking the last time they logged in, many haven't been on for a year or more. Some were on a few days earlier, but hadn't posted in a considerable long time. Why??? I don't know.
Not counting the one post wonders, or the one semester students, or those realy not interested...Perhaps someone can quit plcs.net cold turkey. plcs.net is addictive. If someone is that strongly opinionated, then yes, bye bye.
We have bashing of all types. I am trying not to bash that one big PLC manufacturer so much, and am doing much better. Normally, in a shop environment, Engineering Bashing is generally only second to Management Bashing.
Sorry to say it, time for another poll.
Regards All.....kc