Lancie1 said:
Dan,
Don't believe everything you read about mercury. I suspect that a person would have to try pretty hard to absorb enough mercury through the skin to be dangerous. Like you said, it was used in tooth fillings! When I was a kid in school, many of the boys used to carry around mercury in their pockets. We would take it out and roll it around in our hands to coat pennies and make them shiny.
Many of the "environmental hazard" claims are overblown and overstated. This is true of asbestos, DDT, Freon, and many other chemicals that have been banned. The EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) is often swayed to be on the "safe" side of every issue. The ban on DDT, for example, has caused many deaths in countries with lots of mosquitoes and malaria. Once a ban is made, the government spends a lot of time and effort on publicity to convince everybody that they are right. It seems to work on most people.
Lancie
First let me qualify myself to speak. I have a MS in Industrial Hygiene and Safety and 20 years field NOT office experience.
The EPA has to be more cautions than OSHA. OSHA is designed to protect the healthy adult worker. EPA has to protect the worker popultaion plus the unhealthy and sensitive unborns, newborns, sesiitive, elderly, asthmatic etc etc.
We just wiped out nearly a dozen miners in Va. Supposedly according to the media that mine has received many citations from Mine Safety and Health. Now if that is true, (I don't trust the media), I would favor putting the present and former managers in jail or better yet back in that mine for a year or two - give em a dose of their own medicine so to speak.
When I posted re Mercury I did not mention skin exposure. In teh case of mercury skin absorption is very small especially compared to airborne. The lung has a surface area for absorption approx that of a football field and only a single cell barrier between the air (in alveoli) and the blood. Surface area of the skin is only a square yard if I recall and it is several cell layers thick.
Other stuff like asbestos. Well I filled out the worker comp claims for Bremerton shipyard. Saw plenty with death certificates for asbestosis and mesothelioma (not sure of spelling been a few years - thankfully). Americn industy knew it was dangerous - so did the military. I think shipyard workers were written off as future casualties - but WWII had to be fought and won and asbestos was needed for fuel efficiency to get ships across the Pacific.
Asbestos is like anything else
improperly handled it WILL cause problems
leave it in place properly wrapped it is no problem.
DDT was banned in US because it was too good an insecticide - it did not biodegrade - that is how it travelled up the food chain to eagles and other raptors and caused egg shell softening. It is legal in other nations. Yes refusal to use DDT can cause bigger problems with malaria but I think you will find that is a matter of government economics and indifference. BTW it can still be used in USA with special permit -- they did in Oregon for gypsy moth I think it was before they developed BT bacillus thruingen (spelling??).
There is NO safe chemical including water and on out to nitroglycerin
There ARE safe ways to handle them.
The truck tires etc -- true split rims are (or were?) extremely dangerous. In my mind with split rims that is what a tire shop is for - I am not qualified to tangle with em.
Electric testing with water solution (NON salt BTW). In Idaho Falls the dummy load for US Navy training reactors was a large tank of water with 3 electrodes - 440 three phase. Electric testing can be shaky it is temporary under less than ideal conditions. Done properly it is OK in my mind.
Now for my rant - I keep hearing about all this UL listed stuff.
How is it I can buy absolute JUNK with a UL stamp on it? I know NEC requires UL or other approval but I am not favorably impressed by just a UL sticker. Now if it were CSA or NY fire marshall I would trust them. But in my mind UL is a waste.
Dan Bentler