Ken Roach
Lifetime Supporting Member + Moderator
My most notorious DeviceNet-related diagnostic project was on a conveyor system as well.
I showed up with my oscilloscope, my NetMeter, my protocol analyzer, and a folder full of firmware revision notes about the affected devices. This was a big deal; the story that "DeviceNet is no good" had been going around this major customer, all beginning with this one conveyor.
The lead electrician showed me the conveyor. He steadied his hand on the frame while pointing out the upstream and downstream sections.
After about ten seconds, he jerked his hand back. "Ow! F*** !".
He knelt down to show me the VFD drive enclosure, and opened the door to it. Another ten seconds went by. "Ow ! F*** !".
We walked under the conveyor to view where the cables ran to some DeviceNet photoeyes. He reached out to the frame, then paused, and grabbed a structural I-beam instead.
At this point I had to ask: "What, um, just happened there ?"
"This ***ing conveyor always shocks me."
A millwright chimed in. "Yeah, that one gets me every time too. I hate working on this conveyor. You've got to fix the network".
I put my hand on the frame. "Ow ! Mother****er !"
They had recently changed conveyor belt vendors, and the new ones had nylon lacing instead of steel, so they didn't discharge their static every time the laces passed the steel tail pulley. In addition, a new pedestrian walkway had been installed, and the welders cut through the grounding cable that had previously tied the conveyor to the building's steel frame.
So the only routes from the conveyor to ground for the highly accumulated static charges were through the flexible conduit containing the power cable, and through the grounded DeviceNet cable shield. Or, if you happened to be holding on to the machine, through the body of an unlucky electrician.
The network itself was actually handling the sparks well; the VFD's daughtercard was rebooting when it took a 5 kilovolt spike through the ground plane, but the scanner and the photoeyes and the rest of the devices on the network rode through with no ill effects.
I showed up with my oscilloscope, my NetMeter, my protocol analyzer, and a folder full of firmware revision notes about the affected devices. This was a big deal; the story that "DeviceNet is no good" had been going around this major customer, all beginning with this one conveyor.
The lead electrician showed me the conveyor. He steadied his hand on the frame while pointing out the upstream and downstream sections.
After about ten seconds, he jerked his hand back. "Ow! F*** !".
He knelt down to show me the VFD drive enclosure, and opened the door to it. Another ten seconds went by. "Ow ! F*** !".
We walked under the conveyor to view where the cables ran to some DeviceNet photoeyes. He reached out to the frame, then paused, and grabbed a structural I-beam instead.
At this point I had to ask: "What, um, just happened there ?"
"This ***ing conveyor always shocks me."
A millwright chimed in. "Yeah, that one gets me every time too. I hate working on this conveyor. You've got to fix the network".
I put my hand on the frame. "Ow ! Mother****er !"
They had recently changed conveyor belt vendors, and the new ones had nylon lacing instead of steel, so they didn't discharge their static every time the laces passed the steel tail pulley. In addition, a new pedestrian walkway had been installed, and the welders cut through the grounding cable that had previously tied the conveyor to the building's steel frame.
So the only routes from the conveyor to ground for the highly accumulated static charges were through the flexible conduit containing the power cable, and through the grounded DeviceNet cable shield. Or, if you happened to be holding on to the machine, through the body of an unlucky electrician.
The network itself was actually handling the sparks well; the VFD's daughtercard was rebooting when it took a 5 kilovolt spike through the ground plane, but the scanner and the photoeyes and the rest of the devices on the network rode through with no ill effects.