@drbitboy:
I think if an e-stop is reset Press 2 will still retract immediately if it was between limit switches. Unless the stop button was pressed...I think it could be easily remedied with an e-stop condition dropping out the Auto Run. That was probably implied?
I do agree with the anti-pattern statement. An e-stop reset probably should not be moving parts/machinery...?
In my head thinking about this exercise I was thinking it was a vertical application. So that is why I wanted to hold both presses retracted when stopped...
In this new scenario if we are extending Press 2 and then press the stop button, with neither limit switches active, it will not finish the extend stroke which was my initial intention. Which way is better? Hard to say since its not a real word application.
I do say that this looks nicer.
I think if an e-stop is reset Press 2 will still retract immediately if it was between limit switches. Unless the stop button was pressed...I think it could be easily remedied with an e-stop condition dropping out the Auto Run. That was probably implied?
I do agree with the anti-pattern statement. An e-stop reset probably should not be moving parts/machinery...?
In my head thinking about this exercise I was thinking it was a vertical application. So that is why I wanted to hold both presses retracted when stopped...
In this new scenario if we are extending Press 2 and then press the stop button, with neither limit switches active, it will not finish the extend stroke which was my initial intention. Which way is better? Hard to say since its not a real word application.
I do say that this looks nicer.