JesperMP said:*: Rockwell Support could learn from how swiftly Google handled this issue.
Hahaha... if ever they did, I'd spend a day walking around the office pinching myself.
JesperMP said:*: Rockwell Support could learn from how swiftly Google handled this issue.
JesperMP said:That EULA has since been withdrawn and replaced with a statement that "you own everything that you already own" and this should have been expanded to YouTube and some additional Google controlled sites. (*)
Only issue that I know of now is that every Chrome installation generates a unique serial number, and that number is transmitted with every transaction done with Chrome. Not sure what the purpose is, but some websites are active about this issue. Very Microsoftish.
Jeev said:Chrome is honestly no different to Firefox
Jeev said:Number of FF add-ons I have... 0. Actually in the last couple of days I've noticed Chrome lags on sites where video is streamed. It's getting quite annoying. Even so, FF has been around for how long? Chrome is a beta, do you seriously expect the same support FF or IE have a week after being released? Ha, they're still ironing out bugs.
I'm going back to FF anyhow.
surferb said:Why is it "going back to FF"? A browser is a tool - or an application - not a prom date.
Jeev said:I think if you're going to think of it as a tool, you should be using the right tool for the job
surferb said:Maybe I should think of it like a prom date ;-)
gbradley said:
I was skeptical about the increased speeds, but I really did notice that it was faster.
Worth a download.
http://www.google.com/chrome
Gil47 said:Its my understanding that the lead developer of Firefox, now works for Google so similarities may not be a coincident.
Have others noted Suferb has tipped over the 1000 mark in the last hour and is racing on now, 1010