Stratix 5700 NAT Configuration

Helliana

Member
Join Date
Nov 2011
Location
Louisiana
Posts
801
I got one of the Stratix 5700 w/ NAT switches (1783-BMS10CGN) and cannot get NAT to function. I followed the NAT quickstart guide from the knowledgebase step by step simulating their setup and it still does not function.

Network Setup:
VLan10 - 192.168.1.200, 255.255.255.0
FA1/1 - PC - 192.168.1.2,255.255.255.0,GW=192.168.1.254 VLAN 10
FA1/2 - PLC - 192.168.1.3,255.255.255.0, GW=192.168.1.254 VLAN 10
Gi1/1 - Plant Public Network Switch, Gateway is 10.50.68.1, 255.255.254.0, VLAN10

In the NAT configuration:
Checked 10 in the "Gi1/1 VLANs" box, deselected everything else.
Created a translation with Private IP 192.168.1.2 and Public IP 10.50.68.249.
In the gateway translation box i set Public to 10.50.68.1 and Private to 192.168.1.254

The NAT just does not work. 192.168.1.254 cannot be pinged inside the NAT. 10.50.68.249 cannot be pinged from outside the NAT. I cannot figure out what i am missing. I've tried every combination of settings i can think of. Has anyone got this to work and have any clues what i missing?
 
I got one of the Stratix 5700 w/ NAT switches (1783-BMS10CGN) and cannot get NAT to function. I followed the NAT quickstart guide from the knowledgebase step by step simulating their setup and it still does not function.

Network Setup:
VLan10 - 192.168.1.200, 255.255.255.0
FA1/1 - PC - 192.168.1.2,255.255.255.0,GW=192.168.1.254 VLAN 10
FA1/2 - PLC - 192.168.1.3,255.255.255.0, GW=192.168.1.254 VLAN 10
Gi1/1 - Plant Public Network Switch, Gateway is 10.50.68.1, 255.255.254.0, VLAN10

In the NAT configuration:
Checked 10 in the "Gi1/1 VLANs" box, deselected everything else.

Created a translation with Private IP 192.168.1.2 and Public IP 10.50.68.249.
In the gateway translation box i set Public to 10.50.68.1 and Private to 192.168.1.254

The NAT just does not work. 192.168.1.254 cannot be pinged inside the NAT. 10.50.68.249 cannot be pinged from outside the NAT. I cannot figure out what i am missing. I've tried every combination of settings i can think of. Has anyone got this to work and have any clues what i missing?


What are you trying to do here? First what is 192.168.1.254? is that the 5700's address?

Can you ping from 192.168.1.2 device to everything else in the 192.168.1.xxx subnet? Can everything else ping the 192.168.1.2 device?

You need a drawing to represent what you are trying to acomplish here. Trying to do something like this without a drawing is like tring to wire a 1500 I/O cabinet with no prints. Make your drawing first then post it.

Just a tip as far as you are concerned you must have a private to public entry and a public to private entry for everything you want to NAT.

You can choose single , range or subnet. if single and you have 3 devices to NAT you will need 3 of each entry.

You must have a public address for every private address. You can't send multiple private addresses to a single public address.
 
192.168.1.254 is the Private Gateway translation address. I did set up a single NAT translation for every device. All devices on the 192.xxx subnet can talk to each other, however the translated gateway is not responsive. According to the AB documentation, the Private Gateway is any unused address on this subnet and the Public should be set to the network gateway.

My setup is almost identical to AB Publication# IASIMP-QS038A-EN-P. The only difference is the public ip range is 10.50.68.0, subnet 255.255.254.0, gw: 10.50.68.1.

5700nat.jpg
 
So you have 96 public ip addresses configured? Each address has to be unique and they are all on VLAN 10?

Why everything on VLAN 10? That will be a troubleshoting nightmare.

I would make station 1-12 it's own VLAN and route them in the 8300. It would be much cleaner.
 
Make sure you created your proper NAT entry in both the General tab and under the public to private tab.

Make sre the Gig port you are using is assigned to VLAN 10.

Make sure VLAN truncking is enabled and that the smart port is set for switch for automation.
 
Had all that except had the smartport set the none... maybe thats the issue? Don't remember seeing that anywhere in the UM.

Also, everything is not set up on VLAN 10. I don't know why Rockwell decided to use that for their example. We are connecting the Stratix5700 to our corporate IT network which no one in our plant has access to, hence the need for NAT.
 
Last edited:
Stratix SD card compatibility

Has anyone found that you can use generic SD 1GB cards in Stratix switches? If so, is there any special format that needs to be done to the SD card?

I appreciate any and all comments/suggestions.

Thanks, David
 
David,
I'm guessing that you seen in the manual where it states.. "You must use the 1784-SD1 card available from Rockwell Automation with the switches." and .. "ATTENTION: If a non-Rockwell SD card is used in Stratix switches, Rockwell Automation reserves the right to withhold support."
http://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/um/1783-um007_-en-p.pdf

That being said, I dont "think" there is any special formatting but it may save you some heartache by just getting a 1784-SD1 and guaranteeing that it will work.
I'd bet Rockwell has spent time troubleshooting a customer's problems only to find out later that someone used a crappy SD card from ebay or something..
 

Similar Topics

OK. so for the past week i have been working on setting up our plant wide scada system and changing addresses over to the new network. We have 1...
Replies
4
Views
1,776
Dear all, again thread about NAT on Stratix 5700. I configured NAT in accordance with manuals, and can ping inside PLC from my laptop (that...
Replies
0
Views
2,063
Hello Guys, I need your expertise regarding with the Stratix Switch 5700, actually we have bunch of PLCs connected to the network and all plc are...
Replies
0
Views
2,581
I was hoping to get some help with a Stratix 5700 switch and NAT. We are building a series of identical machines. Lots of remote I/O, etc. Each...
Replies
1
Views
2,885
I'm having a terrible time configuring the NAT. This is exactly the same issue that many others have appeared to have. I've read everything I...
Replies
18
Views
13,420
Back
Top Bottom