converted a program for a L32E to L33ER help

stu

Member
Join Date
Aug 2005
Location
England
Posts
784
Hi guys
I am changing a processor from L32E to a L33ER , I have 4x 1734-aent on the line and 2 pvp , I have done the norm by boot p ,adding the ip address and firmware then I've change the processor in the program and downloaded , but now the issue is when I fitted the processor and go online it does not see any of the AENT units (yellowtriangles) not sure why then the processor goes into fault type 3 error 16 , com's issue I think , but when I put the old processor back in it works OK any ideas guys thanks stu
 
Hi stu

By putting the old processor back in you are showing that all the cables hubs etc are good
I would disable the keying for the units and also check that the firmware works with your version you have flashed the new processor to


Donnchadh
 
The firmware on the old processor was 17 but the new processor is 21 ? I couldn't find a 17 on the L33ER ? Thanks stu
 
Hi stu
I would look at the firmware as l33er cannot be flashed to 17 you are correct on that
There is s table on ab.com showing what firmware you will need for your 1734 units

Donnchadh
 
I would concur with Donnchadh. You need to flash the 1734-AENTs to firmware revision 3.007 minimum before you can use them with a 1769-L33ER...

586280 - Error 16#0203 in the 1734-AENT adapter connected with 1769-L33ER
Access Level: Everyone

Regards,
George
 
Hi guys thanks for that , that's interesting I've didn't know you had to update the firmware on the 1734-aent ? Next question how do you do that or is it on the tech help ? Once again thanks stu
 
beethoven_ii said:
Others may know better than me but is it not just a case of having the correct version of the AOP for the AENT modules?

beethoven_ii,

Your understanding of what might be required here suggests to me that you don't fully understand either what the incompatibility issue is here, or you do not understand the role of the firmware within these modules, or perhaps within anything?

It is because I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding here that I feel compelled to point it out to you, or anyone else unsure. If I am incorrect in thinking this then I do apologise.

The firmware that is loaded into the AENT modules, or pretty much any other device, is to instruct the hardware as to how to operate within itself and with other devices. If support for interaction with a newer device or devices is required, and the existing hardware supports it, then a new firmware is written to update a device's instructions so that it may interact with the newer device(s).

This is, of course, an update at the software level in the device itself. In this case ControlFlash would be used to flash the AENT modules to the required firmware revision which supports the newer CompactLogix controllers.

The minimum reason I would imagine new firmware is required here is because of the revised communications path used with the newer CompactLogix controllers.

So the modules have a fixed hardware Series and an upgradable firmware revision. These are the prerequisites for compatability with other devices.

An Add On Profile (AOP) for a device is what is used in a project to identify the device in the I/O Configuration to the controller. For compatability with the controller the device's hardware Series and firmware revision must be of a compatible level.

The AOP can only be set to match the hardware device using Exact Match, Compatibility Keying or Ignore, but it cannot change or upgrade the prerequisite features to make a device compatible.

So simply "having the correct version of the AOP for the AENT modules", while important to the controller in identifying the device(s) correctly, will not update an actual device if it does not currently meet the prerequisite hardware Series and firmware revision required.

With regard to end device compatability, think of AOPs as intermediate and read only for Series/Revision. You can set them to Compatible Keying or even Ignore, but this will not make the end devices compatible, if they are not.

This is not to be confused with situations where end devices are compatible, but a user just does not have the correct version AOP for the added device. This is where Compatible Keying or Ignore can be used.

For Point/IO, the adapters may be firmware upgradable, but the I/O modules themselves are not (with the exception of the 1734-232ASC). If a module is of an older Series/Revision and is not compatible with certain newer hardware, then the module itself must be exchanged with a compatible Series/Revision module before it will work with the newer hardware.

One example of this, in relation to this thread, is that all Point I/O modules must be hardware Series C minimum before they will work under a 1734-AENT(R). There is no upgrade available or using Compatible Keying, etc. You must use Series C hardware out-of-the-box.

Also, if you have an older Series A 1734-AENT with firmware revision 1.xx, you cannot flash it to revision 2.xx or 3.xx. You must exchange the adapter module. This is because there were hardware upgrades at revision 2.xx which rendered the revision 1.xx modules non-upgradable. However, a revision 2.xx module may be flashed to revision 3.xx as the hardware is still compatible.

There is of course also the Firmware Supervisor option for Logix controllers which allows you to configure the automatic upgrade of the firmware for modules present in the I/O Configuration. The compatible firmware packages are stored on a memory module within the controller, such as the SD Card in the newer Logix controllers. When a compatible hardware module is physically added or replaced, and powered up, the firmware revision is checked for compatability, and if there is a mismatch, the Firmware Supervisor feature will flash the module to the required revision. To use this feature, all module AOPs must be configured for Exact Match.

So, in short, these type compatibility issues are all about the hardware Series and/or firmware revision of the module and will usually require at least flashing the module or at most exchanging it.

If there was any uncertainty, I hope the above helps clear some of it up.

Regards,
George
 
Hi

George great explanation

I often explain it to people this way
It's like having a windows 95 ( for those who can remember) and having a usb stick. Windows 95 would not connect to a usb stick so you could update your operating system to windows 98 and then use the usb stick.
Now you still had the same hardware (pc) but you updated your operating system that had new functions
I think of firmware in much the same way as windows and the pc as the plc or hardware

Now it's not same but I think it helps people to understand it

Donnchadh
 
Yep, that's as good an analogy as any Donnchadh, and nostalgic...

I distinctly remember getting Windows 95 because my sister bought it for me as a birthday present. She purchased it on CD-ROM and at the time and I didn't have a CD-ROM drive in my old Olivetti computer. So I had to add one to a spare drive bay just to install Windows 95. It's not so much the Windows 95 OS that's nostalgic for me, but more the free CD I got with the purchase of the drive, Encarta '95. I have very fond memories of that software encyclopedia...

"Let there be justice for all. Let there be peace for all..."

"I have a dream..."

...and the Mind Maze game. Hours of fun for all the family.

The Internet was still so young, information-wise. So the likes of Encarta were the World Wide Web for a whole generation.

I was only chatting about it not too long ago with my sister online, who lives in Barcelona. I was saying to her I must have a look and see do I still have that CD?

I never did. I forgot about it. But I might just have a root this week now you've reminded me!

Cheers,
George

p.s. C'mon Ireland tonight as we welcome the Bosnians!
 
Yep, that's as good an analogy as any Donnchadh, and nostalgic...

I distinctly remember getting Windows 95 because my sister bought it for me as a birthday present. She purchased it on CD-ROM and at the time and I didn't have a CD-ROM drive in my old Olivetti computer. So I had to add one to a spare drive bay just to install Windows 95. It's not so much the Windows 95 OS that's nostalgic for me, but more the free CD I got with the purchase of the drive, Encarta '95. I have very fond memories of that software encyclopedia...

"Let there be justice for all. Let there be peace for all..."

"I have a dream..."

...and the Mind Maze game. Hours of fun for all the family.

The Internet was still so young, information-wise. So the likes of Encarta were the World Wide Web for a whole generation.

I was only chatting about it not too long ago with my sister online, who lives in Barcelona. I was saying to her I must have a look and see do I still have that CD?

I never did. I forgot about it. But I might just have a root this week now you've reminded me!

Cheers,
George

p.s. C'mon Ireland tonight as we welcome the Bosnians!

Wow! Thanks George. Haven't thought about Encarta in ages! Or britanica for that matter.:ROFLMAO:
 

Similar Topics

I have two PLC programs I need to look at. Can someone convert them to a PDF files. One is a Micrologic 1500 and the other is a SLC 5/03. Change...
Replies
31
Views
8,388
Hello to all.. I need to convert a program that has been written in V16 of RSlogix5000 to Version 15 of RSlogix 5000. How would I go...
Replies
11
Views
3,760
Im trying to convert the old microwin S7 programs to the newest S7 software Does anyone have any suggestions? I have follow the directions siemen...
Replies
2
Views
4,427
Can I get somebody to convert a file for me from .RSS to .PDF? If you can please send me a message and I'll send you the zip file. Thanks-
Replies
1
Views
1,296
I want to start using a VM for all my programming instead of my computer and wanted to see what is the best way to get my physical machine...
Replies
4
Views
1,474
Back
Top Bottom