OkiePC
Lifetime Supporting Member
The bump a timer number could be a quick fix, but a more elegant long term solution might be external feedback on the driven axis. Perhaps a job for an AMCI resolver module?
I used to work with angled stock cutters in the tire industry, and became a big fan of their resolver modules so your mention of angles and PLC trig reminded of that.
In any case, knowing the position of the cutter itself, you could then turn your "poor man's servo" into a much more precise and reliable "positioner on the cheap". That's something I did many times at the rubber factory and had great success, but I did have an analog speed reference bewteen the PLC and VFD, and resolver feedback in most cases (The HT-20 is indestructible).
If the motor and cutter are positively connected, then a shaft encoder on the motor would be nearly as good less any drive train slack.
I used to work with angled stock cutters in the tire industry, and became a big fan of their resolver modules so your mention of angles and PLC trig reminded of that.
In any case, knowing the position of the cutter itself, you could then turn your "poor man's servo" into a much more precise and reliable "positioner on the cheap". That's something I did many times at the rubber factory and had great success, but I did have an analog speed reference bewteen the PLC and VFD, and resolver feedback in most cases (The HT-20 is indestructible).
If the motor and cutter are positively connected, then a shaft encoder on the motor would be nearly as good less any drive train slack.