Drewster1123
Member
I know, there's tons of resources out there on how to setup generic ethernet devices but I just cannot figure this out, I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
I have a test PLC(1756-L55) running revision 13.31 in a rack with 1756-ENBT /A ethernet card(rev 2.1) with a static IP of 192.168.1.243. Out of there, I have an ethernet cable going into a stratix 2000 8 port switch. I also have my PC with static IP 192.168.1.253 and a cognex camera running firmware 6.02.01, at IP address 192.168.1.25.
after adding the Camera to the RSlogix controller tree, i just get a status off "connecting" and "faulted" over and over. (comm format = DINT, input instance 13 size 125, output instance 22 size 124, configuration 1 size 0)
In wireshark I can see CIP I/O packets coming from 192.168.1.25(the camera) but the destination Address is 239.192.4.16. This is the part that is confusing me. where is this destination address coming from? I have been trying to setup an AL1326 IO link Master from IFM as a generic ethernet device but I'm getting similar results. Am i missing something obvious here? do I need to upgrade Revisions or is there a way to make this work? Thanks in advance!
I have a test PLC(1756-L55) running revision 13.31 in a rack with 1756-ENBT /A ethernet card(rev 2.1) with a static IP of 192.168.1.243. Out of there, I have an ethernet cable going into a stratix 2000 8 port switch. I also have my PC with static IP 192.168.1.253 and a cognex camera running firmware 6.02.01, at IP address 192.168.1.25.
after adding the Camera to the RSlogix controller tree, i just get a status off "connecting" and "faulted" over and over. (comm format = DINT, input instance 13 size 125, output instance 22 size 124, configuration 1 size 0)
In wireshark I can see CIP I/O packets coming from 192.168.1.25(the camera) but the destination Address is 239.192.4.16. This is the part that is confusing me. where is this destination address coming from? I have been trying to setup an AL1326 IO link Master from IFM as a generic ethernet device but I'm getting similar results. Am i missing something obvious here? do I need to upgrade Revisions or is there a way to make this work? Thanks in advance!