freakaftr8
Member
OP
oh and also I'm still using the original program not the one with the jumpered run command.
But it did run at Slow Speed? That is amazing that you got 1 speed out of 2 to work the first time!Now when I press speed 1/2 button, its not changing from the first speed.
You have to simulate "removing the part", or the absence of a part, not cover up the sensor. Covering up the sensor seems to me would tell it something is still there.Also the stop on sensor 2 button just stops the track it will not start back up no matter if I cover the sensors or not.
No, I don't think you should have the Load- Black wire connected to anything. But check with a voltmeter between Pin 4 and Pin 3 (-24v) to see if +24 volts appears on that Pin 4 Load- when the sensor is triggered.Should I use load- wire to ground as well?
"Proximity" means it switches when the head is close to ferrous metal. Try putting a piece of steel under a switch, and then seeing if you get +24V between the White and the -24V lead. If so, the switch is working as expected. It may be that your masks do not contain enough metal to trigger the prox switches. If not, you may have to change to a photoswitch type. There are plenty of different types of photoswitches, and one of them will work to detect your masks.
NO, P5.03 is for Speed 3, and it is the one you should use, not P5.02. The problem is the old program was set up by me for Speeds 1 and 2, when all the time you should have been using Speeds 1 and 3.I just answered my ok question p 5.02 was not programmed. I programmed p5.03 instead on accident.
nevermind on wiring the positive and negative leads backwards that did not work but apparently the black wire is my load. Interesting though these photo sensors are the opposite of what I thought they would do. They're normally closed until he source of the object enters the eye then it opens circuit.
so essentially 24 volts is always present until an object enters the eye then the 24 volt signal disappears
I am glad to finally know WHICH type of switch you have. You know, it would have been a lot easier to know that up front when writing the logic for the program! You started out called them photoeyes, then at Post #32, you changed over and started calling them "prox" switches. I thought you must have changed over.Interesting though these photo sensors are the opposite of what I thought they would do.
Are you guys familiar with the cutler hammer perfect prox series 4 wire proximity sensors?